← Back to team overview

kicad-developers team mailing list archive

Re: Better handling of bugs which affect two versions

 

I'm OK with this.  I'm not sure how effective it will be.  It would be
nice if we could make the script fire an email to the dev team that a
commit needs to be cherry-picked to the 5.1 branch.

Cheers,

Wayne

On 12/31/19 9:21 AM, Jon Evans wrote:
> This is a good point, Eeli. 
> 
> Lead devs, what do you think about adding a bright-colored label "needs
> cherry pick" that can be removed when the commits are picked to the
> required branch? That way, we can run searches for this label and
> inspect issues that have it (even if the issue is closed) 
> 
> I guess we could also try to make a script to detect possible mistakes:
> if an issue is closed and has a 5.x milestone, there should be a commit
> on the latest 5.x branch that contains a reference to that issue number.
> If we manually ran this check from time to time, we could catch issues
> before a release. 
> 
> -Jon
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019, 07:14 Eeli Kaikkonen <eeli.kaikkonen@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:eeli.kaikkonen@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     There are some problems with bug reports which affect both the
>     stable branch and the development branch (ATM 5.1.x and 5.99).
> 
>     It's not possible to see from the main list of bugs if both versions
>     are affected. Milestone is only for one.
> 
>     It's not possible to handle versions for bug fixes. It's either
>     closed or opened but if the bug affects both versions, IMO it should
>     remain open until both have received the fix. And as far as I can
>     see it's not possible to see which version was fixed. It can be seen
>     only by going to a commit which fixed it.
> 
>     I don't know if it's even theoretically possible to handle
>     versioning for bugs in gitlab, but it should at least possible to
>     use tags which would make the states visible. Would that be a good idea?
> 
>     (One specific issue is
>     https://gitlab.com/kicad/code/kicad/issues/3711, see the discussion
>     in
>     https://forum.kicad.info/t/5-1-5-another-annoying-pcbnew-bug/20407/13 .)
> 
>     Eeli Kaikkonen
>     _______________________________________________
>     Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>     Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>     More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 


References