kicad-lib-committers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-lib-committers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00206
Re: rectangular passive components
Oh yes, I didn't think about that. We'll leave it as it is for now, then.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Kerusey Karyu <keruseykaryu@xxxxx> wrote:
> Is there any reason to have various footprints such as 0805, 0603, etc.
>> for every component type?
>>
>> There is one rational reason for this, but not such important: Board 3D
> presentation. Someone could use different models for resistors, capacitors
> and inductors.
>
> BTW. I have two sets of chip element footprints. One for resistors and
> inductors with rectangular outline, and capacitors with rounded outline. It
> helps me during first time board assembly process, and when I'm programming
> an very old pick and place machine (used for prototypes).
>
>
>
> If no one objects, we will go that route.
>>
>> Apart from the above, I have no objection.
> I'm using my own set of footprints. :)
>
> Kerusey Karyu
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers
> Post to : kicad-lib-committers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
References