kicad-lib-committers team mailing list archive

[Carl Poirier <carl.poirier.2@xxxxxxxxx>]

I think what you suggest would be acceptable, but I'd like to have the
opinion of some people with more experience. Lorenzo and Jean-Paul?

On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Carl Poirier <carl.poirier.2@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Did we have some conversation about it when we moved the values?
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:09 PM, nnn <nnn4000@xxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Can we make some decisions about assembly layer?
>> We moved there values but AFAIK more important is to have there
>> references.
>>
>> What do you think about:
>> - leaving references on silkscreen, size 1x1x0.15 as is,
>> - moving values back to silkscreen and hiding, size 1x1x0.15,
>> - adding visible copy of reference on assembly (%R) - this will be
>> smaller if footprint is small
>> - adding invisible copy of value on assembly (%V) - this will be smaller
>> if footprint is small
>> - optional: copy silkscreen to assembly - as starting point for proper
>> assembly
>> ?
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers
>> Post to     : kicad-lib-committers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>