Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Thank you, Oliver. Enjoy. :)Meanwhile, the script keeps rejecting any pushes although the rejection criteria is clearly not included in the documented KLC.
I haven't found any documented recommendations regarding positions and alignment:
Violating EC03 - Extra Checking Check part reference, name and footprint position and alignment field: reference, posx 400, posy 600, recommended posx -700, posy 525 field: reference, justification L, recommended R field: name, posx 400, posy 500, recommended posx -700, posy 450 field: name, justification L, recommended R field: footprint, posx -800, posy -600, recommended posx 650, posy -450This is a blocker for any library contribution. Can anyone, PLEASE, solve this ?
Regards, Miron On 25.02.2017 11:36, Oliver Walters wrote:
Not yet, sorry. Currently away for a couple of days. Will get to it when I can :)On 25 Feb 2017 8:35 PM, "Miron Iancu" <miancu@xxxxxxxx <mailto:miancu@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:Mornin' Oliver. Any updates about the same ? BR Miron On 24.02.2017 23:28, Oliver Walters wrote:Thanks miron, I'll look into this On 25 Feb 2017 06:34, "Miron Iancu" <miancu@xxxxxxxx <mailto:miancu@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: One more example - this script is flawed: Violating EC01 - Extra Checking Check pins names against pin types. pin VOUT (12): O (OUTPUT), expected: w (POWER OUTPUT) pin VREF (15): I (INPUT), expected: W (POWER INPUT) The component is AD8362ARU and I assume the script tries to do some ERC for the electrical type of the pins. On AD8362xx (and many others) the so called VOUT pin is NOT power output, it is purely logarithmic output so the type is correctly set as "O" and SHOULD NOT be "w". If you base the accept/ rejection of a pull request on these semantic rules, not only the checks will always fail but the ERC will definetely not be consistent with the reality. Please modify the script. It simply does not deliver. BR MironPe 24 feb. 2017, la 21:26, Miron Iancu <miancu@xxxxxxxx <mailto:miancu@xxxxxxxx>> a scris: Hello everybody, While creating a pull request for some components, the check script (Travis) provides such "recommendations" Violating EC03 - Extra Checking Check part reference, name and footprint position and alignment field: reference, posx 400, posy 600, recommended posx -700, posy 525 field: reference, justification L, recommended R field: name, posx 400, posy 500, recommended posx -700, posy 450 field: name, justification L, recommended R field: footprint, posx -800, posy -600, recommended posx 650, posy -450 These are not part of the KLC AFAIK and the script exits with error. We should strictly stick to the rules not recommendations. It is quite frustrating, I tried four times to get same errors. You either remove these from the script, or update the KLC regards, M-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers<https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-lib-committers> Post to : kicad-lib-committers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-lib-committers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers <https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-lib-committers> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers <https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-lib-committers> Post to : kicad-lib-committers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-lib-committers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers <https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-lib-committers> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |