launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02779
Re: Model objects and doc tests
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Julian Edwards
<julian.edwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Monday 01 March 2010 12:27:50 Jonathan Lange wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Julian Edwards
>>
>> <julian.edwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Monday 01 March 2010 12:10:43 Jonathan Lange wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> >> (Also, what makes model objects so special anyway?)
>> >
>> > Precedent. Pretty much most of our model objects already have this. Our
>> > doc strings are mostly awful and where they are not awful they are
>> > mediocre.
>>
>> What I meant was, why does this kind of class need documentation more
>> than any other kind of class?
>
> Because they are the most important class in our code base - they form the
> very core of everything that Launchpad does.
>
There's a big intersection between "extremely important classes" and
"model classes", but they aren't equal. SeriesSourcePackageBranch is a
good example of an unimportant model object. SourcePackage and
BranchNamespace are good examples of an important non-model object.
I guess I'm assuming that by "model" you mean "represents a row in the
database", which you might not be.
jml
References