launchpad-dev team mailing list archive

["Francis J. Lacoste" <francis.lacoste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We should support:

* The latest stable release (what LP devs use)
* The latest LTS release (what the server should be running)
* The LTS release in production (because sometime, like now, that's now 
actually the latest LTS release)
* The latest development release (because many Ubuntu dev are actually running 
that, and the LP dev upgrade at beta time)

-- 
Francis J. Lacoste
francis.lacoste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On July 23, 2010, Julian Edwards wrote:
> On Thursday 22 July 2010 16:00:17 Max Bowsher wrote:
> > I think the time has come to officially de-support Jaunty as a Launchpad
> > development platform.
> > 
> > It now has only 3 months to run before EOL, and I doubt anyone would
> > deem it worthwhile to spend time on validating the
> > launchpad-messagequeue-dependencies stack there.
> > 
> > If there are no objections, please would a ~launchpad member delete all
> > Jaunty publications from the Launchpad PPA to clearly represent this /
> > avoid potential confusion.
> 
> Let's ask another question - why are we supporting anything other than the
> latest LTS and the latest stable release?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev
> Post to     : launchpad-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.