launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #05960
Re: Minimal candidate for roll-out 10007 or 10026
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Aaron Bentley <aaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/01/2010 02:55 PM, Francis J. Lacoste wrote:
>> Hi Aaron,
>>
>> Like you probably know, Henninge and Jereon decided to revert the upstream-
>> translations-sharing work as proper QA couldn't be completed in the window.
>>
>> That means that we will need either to merge 10007 (the work was merged into
>> 10008) or make sure that everything until at least 10026 is QA-ok (where it
>> was reverted).
>
> 10026 has landed, and I believe all necessary QA has been done, up to
> the current tip, 10029. One of the stable revisions merged by 10026
> still need QA: 12008. One of the revisions merged by 10029 still needs
> QA: 12011.
>
> So depending on how QA goes, and what our appetite for risk is, we could
> merge 10029.
>
> There is a fly in the ointment, though. I believe we may exceed our
> database time budget. I put us at 3256.47 seconds, which would
> translate as ~114 minutes when we deploy. My calculations are attached.
Where did the 1876.47 come from?
--
Stuart Bishop <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.stuartbishop.net/
Follow ups
References