← Back to team overview

launchpad-dev team mailing list archive

Re: lp-propose can make your life (and your reviewer's) better

 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10-12-15 08:18 PM, Martin Pool wrote:
> The biggest thing I hit in using lp-propose was that it failed if
> there was already a proposal from the same branch

Please file a bug.  It should only fail if the existing proposal is in a
non-terminal state, like "work-in-progress" or "needs review".  And even
then, we could support a --resubmit that worked like the web UI's resubmit.

>, and for some things
> like 'doc' I tend to reuse the branches.  But I guess I could just fix
> that.

The behaviour you describe is a bug, but there are many others like it.
 Launchpad assumes feature branches all over the place in its design
(e.g. linking bugs to branches), and behaves badly when branches are reused.

I used to re-use branches, (remember bzr.ab?) but with Launchpad, you're
just fighting against the design when you do that.  So you may wish to
reconsider that practice.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk0Jf+AACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI3kfQCeLGnB8qLAGEs4IBtr/2H8QXLy
U4UAn3ETWqZEHbDHKbcNYnzxSNy/71L9
=HfTx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Follow ups

References