launchpad-dev team mailing list archive

[Max Kanat-Alexander <mkanat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 01/28/2011 02:51 PM, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> 2) Test coverage overall is pretty darn poor. Which is partially why
> loggerhead isn't particularly stable to hack on. (The things you are
> testing right now pass, but things you didn't think about start breaking.)

	Yeah, that's what I thought, and improving that coverage before we say
that trunk is stable was my goal (and was what I've been talking about
in this thread).

> It would certainly be good to at least have smoketests for regressions.
> I'm not 100% sure what a good test framework is for something like
> Loggerhead. I don't think we want to test too much at the WSGI level
> (integration vs unit tests, etc.). But we could certainly use a few
> integration-level tests.

	Yeah, agreed. I remember liking whatever comes with Pylons, but I don't
know if it works outside of Pylons.

	-Max
-- 
http://www.bugzillasource.com/
Competent, Friendly Bugzilla, Perl, and IT Services