launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06416
Re: development focus series for 'Debian' in Launchpad
-
To:
Launchpad Community Development Team <launchpad-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Julian Edwards <julian.edwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:51:13 +0000
-
In-reply-to:
<AANLkTimCACv=M541kdKzKKWKV9P=XTmN5waqOhvYLbRP@mail.gmail.com>
-
Organization:
Canonical Ltd
-
User-agent:
KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-25-generic; KDE/4.5.1; x86_64; ; )
On Friday 04 February 2011 15:13:41 Jonathan Lange wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Robert Collins
> <robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
>
> > Are there any booby traps in the system that would blow up if we made
> > 'sid' the development release, with squeeze etc forks off from it.
> > This seems to represent what we do in debian better *anyway*: sid and
> > squeeze are different branches, even if squeeze branches only have a
> > strict prefix of the sid history.
>
> I think it's good for codehosting, but be wary of traps in soyuz, bugs etc.
Soyuz should be fine, it doesn't really care about development status in
Debian since it doesn't manage Debian directly. The archive admins might see
some different defaults when syncing though.
References