launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06946
Re: Correct links for bug triage
On April 14, 2011, Robert Collins wrote:
> > Unless you disagree, I'll update BugTriage and MaintenanceRotation
> > schedule with my proposed link.
>
> I'm not sure if I agree or disagree :) - I think the key things are:
> - every bug should be touched just enough to decide if its critical/high
> - it should be easy to query or sort our triaged bugs
> - our main web UI should not tell other folk we haven't been triaging
> (and leaving a bug as e.g. 'high with status new' would leave a count
> marker in the progress bar)
>
> I agree about with dropping INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE which we can
> do very easy from both searches... though I'll note that once we fix
> bug expiry it will shrink that apparent backlog very quickly.
>
> What do you think?
Well, incomplete bugs expire after 30 days, so it's still a long time to have
dangling requests in our queue.
I agree that removing INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE is the thing to do from the
queries. I'm still not sure that having to visit two links really pulls its
weight.
--
Francis J. Lacoste
francis.lacoste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Follow ups
References