← Back to team overview

launchpad-dev team mailing list archive

Re: Correct links for bug triage

 

On April 14, 2011, Robert Collins wrote:
> > Unless you disagree, I'll update BugTriage and MaintenanceRotation
> > schedule with my proposed link.
> 
> I'm not sure if I agree or disagree :) - I think the key things are:
>  - every bug should be touched just enough to decide if its critical/high
>  - it should be easy to query or sort our triaged bugs
>  - our main web UI should not tell other folk we haven't been triaging
> (and leaving a bug as e.g. 'high with status new' would leave a count
> marker in the progress bar)
> 
> I agree about with dropping INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE which we can
> do very easy from both searches... though I'll note that once we fix
> bug expiry it will shrink that apparent backlog very quickly.
> 
> What do you think?

Well, incomplete bugs expire after 30 days, so it's still a long time to have 
dangling requests in our queue. 

I agree that removing INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE is the thing to do from the 
queries. I'm still not sure that having to visit two links really pulls its 
weight.

-- 
Francis J. Lacoste
francis.lacoste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Follow ups

References