launchpad-dev team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: capturing backtraces on every 'expensive' operation

To: launchpad-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Julian Edwards <julian.edwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:53:54 +0000
In-reply-to: <CAJ3HoZ3z2zJmtkmviO7Ro9wuCcJzK+KtnAB_-YLya46iPp=zkA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Canonical Ltd
User-agent: KMail/4.7.2 (Linux/3.0.0-12-generic; KDE/4.7.2; x86_64; ; )

On Sunday 20 November 2011 09:15:28 Robert Collins wrote:
> Some low hanging fruit to get a longer gc period, if we want one:
>  - we can compress the oopses - they compress very very well.
>    - this just needs a patch to amqp2disk -  oops-tools already
> handles compressed oopses.
>  - we can move oops-tools to a dedicated server (already planned)

Also don't bother capturing the first 10-20 queries, they are always pretty 
much the same boilerplate ones.

References

capturing backtraces on every 'expensive' operation
From: Robert Collins, 2011-11-16
Re: capturing backtraces on every 'expensive' operation
From: William Grant, 2011-11-18
Re: capturing backtraces on every 'expensive' operation
From: Robert Collins, 2011-11-19