launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #08932
Re: Can we get rid of +specworkload?
On 10/02/12 13:22, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 11 February 2012 07:51, Guilherme Salgado
> <guilherme.salgado@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> After grepping through the logs I found that there were only 115
>> requests (after excluding the ones that came from google searches for
>> things seemingly unrelated to LP) for a +specworkload page in January
>> (see the attached script for the details). So, given that it's not much
>> used, doesn't serve any purpose for an IPerson and times out for an
>> ITeam, I believe Launchpad would benefit from having it removed
>> altogether. Any objections?
>>
>> PS: Robert, notice that the total of requests I found from grepping the
>> logs is almost half of the # of requests on ppr for the same month, so I
>> may have missed some logs there, although I don't think that'd make a
>> significant difference to the trend we see here
>
> Is it possible to grep to see which users are accessing it? It seems
> like the kind of thing that might have one or two users who care about
> it very much, or at least would like to be told in advance.
Out of the 115 requests we have 91 from anonymous users, 14 from 9
unique users[1] and 10 were actually 404s, for which the user doesn't
seem to be logged (i.e. no Anonymous or user id strings).
[1] "3355493" "4255840" "4265464" "4304737" "4814731" "4901002"
"4904013" "4906280" "4907163"
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Follow ups
References