launchpad-reviewers team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-reviewers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #10527
Re: [Merge] lp:~jcsackett/launchpad/remove-bad-subscribers into lp:launchpad
Review: Needs Information code
Hi Jon.
As Steven's and Ian's work to honour structural subscriptions is completing, the focus on subscribing roles will soon be mute. I do not want to abandon your work though. The removal of test_transition_to_private_grants_subscribers_access demonstrates that there is still a problem with Lp's behaviour that your branch fixes. We do not want random direct bug subscribers to be granted access.
1. I think the preservation of existing driver subscriptions is good.
Maybe the code can be DRY if `required_subscribers.add(pillar.driver)`
was in the ` if information_type in PRIVATE_INFORMATION_TYPES` block
2. Is the bug reporter and person making the information type change
also subscribed and given an access grant?
3. Is there a test that shows that the reporter, changer, and driver
have access?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~jcsackett/launchpad/remove-bad-subscribers/+merge/117771
Your team Launchpad code reviewers is subscribed to branch lp:launchpad.
Follow ups
References