launchpad-reviewers team mailing list archive

[Ian Booth <ian.booth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 I did have the same thought as you that if people had private things 
but no commercial subscription, then too bad, serves them right.  
William convinced me to - he said that the affected projects are 
Linaro/Canonial and we would/could be exposing private information. I 
wasn't winning the argument so thought it best just to make the change.

On Sat 18 Aug 2012 00:21:33 EST, Curtis Hovey wrote:
> You have NOT needed to kill the branch. The process that manages the EOL of a commercial subscription deletes the subscription, sets bugs to public by default, and ignores BVP. The maintainer was informed that no one can create private branches anymore. Since we abandoned branch multi-tenancy last year, any team abusing the existing BVPs should be smacked (and charged $250 USD). Once we enter beta, the EOL process will set the policies to Public as is claimed in the email.
>
> As a commercial-admin, I will set the project's policies to public regardless of an existing BVP if there is no commercial subscription.

-- 
https://code.launchpad.net/~wallyworld/launchpad/project-sharingpolicy-garbo-job2/+merge/120063
Your team Launchpad code reviewers is subscribed to branch lp:launchpad.