Hi, Recently, mscore was uploaded to hardy. Having been previously published in my PPA, the needs-packaging bug [0] closure was in the initial changelog entry, but there had been subsequent updates to the package. As a result, on upload to Ubuntu, the bug closure information was not in the most recent entry. The bug was not also closed by the upload. It therefore seems sane to suggest that these two are linked, and that bugs are only closed by uploads mentioning them in the most recent entry. I can see reasons why this is a reasonable decision (for instance, to have Launchpad check through the entire changelog for bugs, and ensure those are closed, would presumably place high demands on CPU time), but am not sure if it is documented anywhere. Can somebody confirm that my analysis is correct? I did check for documentation, but did not find any mention of this behaviour. Thanks, Toby Smithe [0] http://launchpad.net/bugs/152650
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)