On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:40 PM, (``-_-´´) -- Fernando <ubuntu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Just confirming that I was able to post via email a new bug (bug #210133) Great! > I havent yet re-read the new help reply email from mallone, > but I'll send an email next to get one and check if the text is more obvious. It will be great to get help testing this. Bear in mind that this is simply the text from the wiki, and that it lags behind the wiki a bit. If you want to proof-read the text you should refer to the wiki. There, you can also make changes to the text if you think that it can be improved! > Also I did not receive and expected acknowledge email, > so I would know that the email was received. I'll see if there is an open bug for that. I'm not sure this is a desirable feature. We're now in the process of making all error conditions send you an email, so that you can safely assume that if an error email hasn't been sent the incoming email was processed correctly. If at all, I think a request for confirmation should only be an optional flag, since I expect many users would not like the extra incoming email (I know I wouldn't like it). What do you think? > By the way, just out of curiosity: what is the current limit of submited bug to LP? > I've seen the counter growing quite fast the in the last few weeks. > So how long can LP DBs hold on? How big is that key ID field, lol? You're right, the database is almost nearly full, which is why we have decided that once we reach the limit (I think there are about 300 or so IDs left) we're simply going to delete the existing DB and start from scratch. After all, bugs that old probably aren't worth fixing anyway. In fact, it has been suggested that we make it a tradition and start with a fresh bugs database every year on April 1st ;-) Tom
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)