On January 18, 2009, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > Just two comments: > > p-l-b doesn't necessarily put more load on the server. It depends on > what it's doing -- fetching +text is actually cheaper than pulling > in bug data via the API. Only marginally cheaper. Not a big difference actually. > > If a username/password was hardcoded and the software caused > problems, we could definitely throttle or disable that user. > > Having said that, I am not philosophically opposed to allowing read-only > access to anonymous users, having said that (via Launchpad.View for > instance). Leonard, is there any non-technical reason why we shouldn't > do it, or alternatively, is there a strong technical one? The only reason was for throttling and auditing. -- Francis J. Lacoste francis.lacoste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)