launchpad-users team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-users team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #07116
Re: Launchpad builder VMs upgraded to bionic
-
To:
Steve Langasek <steve.langasek@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>, Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Desrochers <eric.desrochers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, launchpad-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Colin Watson <cjwatson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:44:00 +0100
-
In-reply-to:
<20200909222504.GC3841855@homer.dodds.net>
-
Mail-followup-to:
Steve Langasek <steve.langasek@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>, Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Desrochers <eric.desrochers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, launchpad-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
User-agent:
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
[Restoring CC of launchpad-users@ - not sure why this was dropped.]
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 03:25:04PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:33:00AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > I have not tried this, but i think one should be able to create a
> > snippet in /etc/security/limits.d/ with like
>
> > * soft memlock unlimited
> > * hard memlock unlimited
>
> > Or to the appropriate value of 64*1024 instead of unlimited.
>
> Which should only take effect for things which are part of PAM sessions that
> have invoked pam_limits. I don't think this would be true for the builders?
Correct - pam_limits isn't going to be involved here. Would something
involving DefaultLimitMEMLOCK= do the job, maybe?
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwatson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Follow ups
References
