linaro-project-management team mailing list archive

[Christian Robottom Reis <kiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:12:27PM +0100, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> As we discussed on IRC. There is already a ~linaro team whose members are:
> 
>  * ~linaro-foundations
>  * ~linaro-infratructure
>  * ~linaro-user-platforms
> 
> There is no reason why we can't add the WG's to this team too.

Well, there is a reason you stated on IRC, which is that WGs would need
milestones that lined up with Linaro as well. Is that correct?

Perhaps the better way of doing it would be to have:

    - A platform status page, which encompassed Foundations, User
      Platforms and possibly Infrastructure (though maybe that's best
      tracked outside).

    - A page for each working group (and possibly Infrastructure as per
      the above) according to its own milestones.

> Obviously the best way to track the blueprints if we do this is
> outside of launchpad but the mechanism to do this is already there
> since I pushed a change to the tracking scripts a few months ago.

I think you meant "inside Launchpad" above but yes, if the code is there
I agree.

> Currently the core teams blueprints are tracked at:
> 
>     http://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/LinaroStatus

Not having the WGs there means that absolutely should not be called
LinaroStatus; could we start by getting that renamed to PlatformStatus?

(Next question is whether we could rename that page to something under
Releases/1011/ and the one after that is whether we could use it dated
so people could see the progress, i.e.

    Releases/1011/Status/Platform/2010-09-05
    Releases/1011/Status/Infrastructure/2010-09-05
    Releases/1011/Status/Infrastructure/2010-09-05

Or whether you'd like to have those under the team's hierarchies and
linked to from Releases/1011/Status instead)
-- 
Christian Robottom Reis   | [+55 16] 3376 0125 | http://launchpad.net/~kiko
Canonical Ltd.            | [+55 16] 9112 6430 | http://async.com.br/~kiko