← Back to team overview

linaro-project-management team mailing list archive

Re: Can we implement kiko's proposed roadmap flow by the next Connect? (was Re: Updated Roadmap to BP slide deck)

 

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:39:55 -0400, James Westby <james.westby@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 10:43:25 +0200, Alexander Sack <asac@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > create project for status.linaro.org as part of infrastructure
> > component, create "backlog" milestone, put it there with essential
> > importance, and there its sitting quite high on top! :-P
> 
> A couple of problems with this:
> 
>   * That's the backlog for one component. If we have essential items in
>     the backlog for every component then which is most essential?
> 
>   * More importantly nowhere in our process does a backlog currently
>     appear, so I don't see much value in doing this currently. The
>     slides presented by kiko mention a backlog, but don't explain how it
>     will be used, and I don't see a use for one in that presented plan.

Going over it again, I think I've found where the backlog lives:

   * When a card is decomposed at a Connect, the resulting engineering
     blueprints are placed in a backlog.
   * At the start of each month blueprints are taken from the backlog
     and assinged.
   * At the end of each quarter anything that remains on the backlog is
     assessed, and dropped or moved to another quarter.

Can this scheme work well if we don't have a priority ordered backlog
per-team, and only have one per-project?

Thanks,

James


Follow ups

References