← Back to team overview

linaro-project-management team mailing list archive

Re: Can we implement kiko's proposed roadmap flow by the next Connect? (was Re: Updated Roadmap to BP slide deck)

 

On 16/08/11 23:45, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:39:55AM -0400, James Westby wrote:
>>   * More importantly nowhere in our process does a backlog currently
>>     appear, so I don't see much value in doing this currently. The
>>     slides presented by kiko mention a backlog, but don't explain how it
>>     will be used, and I don't see a use for one in that presented plan.
> 
> I wimped out on trying to solve the backlog problem together with this
> set of changes; sorry. I think the backlog can be handled by an explicit
> "backlog" milestone created for each project, and then rolled up into a
> project group milestone, and would be willing to help somebody
> interested in prototyping that along.


Backlog in a milestone or in a series? I quite like what Salveti is
doing in eg in https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-ubuntu/backlog.
It means that one could even try to split a backlog in rough time ranges
such as quarters (so items for the quarter after the next one would be
still possible to place in the right time-basket and have them ready for
review at Connect).

I am not sure if using a series there would be any LP limitation in the
rolling up you mentioned, but it would be great to have some rolling up
possible, otherwise I would have to dig into individual project backlogs
and that could be inconvenient.

BR,
-- 
Ilias Biris ilias.biris@xxxxxxxxxx
Project Manager, Linaro
M: +358504839608, IRC: ibiris Skype: ilias_biris
Linaro.org│ Open source software for ARM SoCs


Follow ups

References