linaro-project-management team mailing list archive

[James Westby <james.westby@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:06:52 +0200, Alexander Sack <asac@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> to better support the workflow and stakeholder flow that we are implementing
> we should have the card view table split up in tables based on where a
> blueprint is in our agile work flow:
> 
>  + Completed table (big green table right on top)
>  + Coming next (give the audience clear message was is worked on and will
> come out of the machine next)
>  + Planned next (give audience a clear indication what will be worked on
> next if noone jumps in and makes a point that something else from backlog
> should be rather get higher priority)
>  + Backlog (give audience a list of things that are discussed about and show
> them in agreed priority if stakeholders of that team prefers to)
> 
> Note:
> I propose to _not_ show a dropped table inline on that page as that would
> again make folks believe that this is the "failure". Instead I would propose
> to have a link below the other tables to a separate page that shows the
> "abandoned ideas" or "idea graveyard" etc.

This seems to completely disagree with what Joey just requested. Would
you look at what he proposed, and Joey would you look at this, and then
see if you can resolve the differences?

> One important thing that I think we should put on the card view as well is
> the contact email address of the owning PM. In this way the ambitious TSC
> member or other interested stakeholders know how to contact if they want to
> propose change of priority and propose something else as "next" ... or if
> they want something else to go into the backlog.

I'll add this.

Thanks,

James