| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
On 29/09/12 20:26, the mail apparently from Ilias Biris included:
Hi Andy thanks for your feedback. Perhaps I should have explicitly added the line "if you handle roadmap requirements through JIRA cards, AND work with Launchpad Blueprints then continue reading" But nevertheless thanks for taking the time to answer.
Maybe it's time to refine what is meant by "techleads@l.o" then, because there is now zero meaningful techlead-level content coming to landing team leads for over a year now.
On 29/09/12 15:00, Andy Green wrote:On 29/09/12 16:40, the mail apparently from Ilias Biris included: I use LP as well for bugs nobody has ever mentioned in a bug or otherwise cared to my knowledge about status.linaro.org. Rather than asking me (especially as a Landing Team lead "fake-tech-lead") why don't you mine the webserver logs and objectively determine how much impact status.linaro.org has?That's a good idea, and I admit not having thought of it. However, it has been such a long time since s.l.o was working properly that the mined results would probably not be representative of what folks want to do NOW. I also wanted to make sure I get human feedback rather than just numbers.
When you say, "human feedback rather than just numbers", you actually mean, "instead" of objective numbers, right?
-Andy -- Andy Green | TI Landing Team Leader Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs | Follow Linarohttp://facebook.com/pages/Linaro/155974581091106 - http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://linaro.org/linaro-blog
| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
