← Back to team overview

linaro-release team mailing list archive

[Blueprint linaro-general-release-process-improvements-lcq4.11] Linaro release process improvements

 

Blueprint changed by Fathi Boudra:

Whiteboard changed:
  Agenda:
- * current release process - what's the current process?
- * release internals - how the release works?
- * the road to continuous integration - how the CI is going to transform the release?
+ Current release process - what's the current process?
+  * Monthly cadence (iterative), running on approximatively 4 weeks
+  * Components release (one week before platform release, on Thursday)
+  * Platform release (last Thursday of the month at 16:00 UTC, Release Candidate available on Monday)
  
- [zpfeffer 2011/10/31] Notes from LDS:
+ Release internals - how the release works?
+  * Planning phase (beginning of the new cycle, end of previous cycle)
+    * using blueprints: commited to deliver essential/high priorities, backlog milestone
+    * view/status available on http://status.linaro.org/
+  * Execution phase (mid-cycle)
+  * Release phase (end of cycle)
+  * QA testing (automated and manual)
+  * Post-mortem (lessons learned)
+ 
+ The road to Continuous Integration - how the CI is going to transform the release?
+  * source code repository 
+    -> daily packages build (Ubuntu specific)
+       -> daily images build
+         -> daily images testing on LAVA
+             -> bugs reporting
+                 -> release reporting
+  * Metrics: bugs, benchmarks, etc...
+  * Roadmap: http://linaro.kanbantool.com/public_view-9487de29a82f2.html
+ 
+ Notes from LDS:
+ [zpfeffer, 2011-10-31]
  Current Release Process
  
  Monthly
  Last Thursday of the month
  
  How do we decide what goes into the release?
  
  How do we communicate which patches have landed?
      Track which patches have actually landed in the tip?
  
  CI works if we fix things when they break
      Android has to rebase each day for some repos, kernel gets rebased
  
  Need to track Linus-HEAD and Deepak-HEAD
  
- AI: Deepak: What does Linux Linaro's kernel need to be
- AI: Ricardo: Discuss Linus HEAD, Linus NEXT
- AI: <platform team>: kernel flows docs
- AI: Zach:
- AI: Deepak: Will look at each kernel that we ship and say which patches made it in
+ ACTION: Deepak: What does Linux Linaro's kernel need to be
+ ACTION: Ricardo: Discuss Linus HEAD, Linus NEXT
+ ACTION: <platform team>: kernel flows docs
+ ACTION: Zach:
+ ACTION: Deepak: Will look at each kernel that we ship and say which patches made it in
  
  Release Internals
  
  Planning, Post-mortum
     Essential and High and committed to be delivered
  
  BPs used in status.linaro.org
  
  Alexander
     A few things
        Planning takes too long
            Expectation: Post-mortum on Friday 23:59 UTC
                Plan is available on Monday UTC 23:59
                You should have the backlog sorted by priority
            Should happen on Mumble not IRC
  
      QA Testing
          Happens on release
          Android has a QA engineer
          Need to test components
          Components needed
          Release checkpoint shipped along with components
  
- AI: asac: will drive test standardization across the industry.
+ ACTION: asac: will drive test standardization across the industry.
  
  CI
  
  Android is here, need to get Ubuntu there
  Disk space issues, staging PPA and
  
- AI: Ricardo: Need disk space
- AI: component release testing
- AI: Paul: Fix deployment and roleout
- AI: Paul: Need smoke tests and ability to back out
- AI: Ricardo and Zach: File bugs
+ ACTION: Ricardo: Need disk space
+ ACTION: component release testing
+ ACTION: Paul: Fix deployment and roleout
+ ACTION: Paul: Need smoke tests and ability to back out
+ ACTION: Ricardo and Zach: File bugs
+ 
+ [fboudra, 2011-10-31]
+ miscommunication with the kernel delivery, working upstream. Actual code isn't available in the Platform.
+ -> Android tracks LTs TIP kernels
+ -> which tree should we track and release?
+ 
+ disk space issue (should be fixed)
+ -> who write test cases/responsability?
+ 
+ LAVA deployment process shouldn't be disruptive
+ 
+ ACTION: deepak: discuss about linux-linaro at the kernel release/mapping session
+ ACTION: everybody: stress test lava

-- 
Linaro release process improvements
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-project-management/+spec/linaro-general-release-process-improvements-lcq4.11