linuxpadawan team mailing list archive

[Walter Lapchynski <wxl@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Certainly having some sort of rubric/standard would better help guide the
whole mentoring process. Let us know what we can do to help build this!!!

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Svetlana Belkin <belkinsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> +1 for the rubric. I might also use that idea for the community service
> learning project that I want roll out/test out in early/mid Q1 of 2017.
>
> Also as another thought: would it worth it to do an interview for each
> Master/Padawan to see how well the Padawan does that skill and/or what
> skills to work if the student doesn't not know what to work on. Idealy
> there would be post interview and these will used as records rather than
> blog post material.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, at 12:40 AM, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
>
> Yeah and then there's the other consideration: not all skills are
> technical.
>
> I think the only way we can actually come up with a fair system is to put
> together a rubric for each set of skills as a community.
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Israel <israeldahl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 12/05/2016 04:41 PM, Svetlana Belkin wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Since Linux Padawan is a mentoring/learning system, I think we need a
> > way to grade ourselves on how well we know the skill that we have. The
> > first question is it (the system) really needed? And the second is how
> > should be it done.  As in, use the A - F system, 1 - 5 system, or
> > another one?
> >
> > Thank you in advance for you input on this.
>
> Hi,
>
> If there was some sort of independent system to produce the grade,
> rather than "I think I'm A++ because I wanna seem super awesome" I think
> it would be beneficial to both the learners as well as the teachers to
> challenge themselves to learn more about the skills/languages/etc..
>
> It might be possible to reach out to The Linux Foundation for some
> materials to do this for Linux system/network aspects, and perhaps even
> Bash/shell scripting.
>
> Or we could internally evaluate each others' code if a few of us share
> common programming languages, code does not lie (though it can be
> unclear, which could be an indication in of itself).
>
> Evaluation of general GNU/Linux (server/admin) skills will be harder
> without some sort of standard test, or exercise to give a concrete result.
>
> --
> Regards
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linuxpadawan
> Post to     : linuxpadawan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linuxpadawan
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
> --
>        @wxl | polka.bike
> C563 CAC5 8BE1 2F22 A49D
> 68F6 8B57 A48B C4F2 051A
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linuxpadawan
> Post to     : linuxpadawan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linuxpadawan
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
> Svetlana Belkin
> A.K.A: belkinsa
> User Wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/belkinsa
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linuxpadawan
> Post to     : linuxpadawan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linuxpadawan
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


-- 
       @wxl | polka.bike
C563 CAC5 8BE1 2F22 A49D
68F6 8B57 A48B C4F2 051A