lubuntu-desktop team mailing list archive

[Pablo Marcondes <pablo.mmarcondes@xxxxxxxxx>]

I vote for #2 too, this is one of the features we can have on a Linux
distributions that micro$oft could not: a complete workstation in a
few clicks.

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:51 PM, AdamBOT <adambot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I also agree that we should go for #2, mainly because when i get a
> distro, i want it to just work, i don't want to have to install basic
> things like a full featured web browser (firefox) or office suite
> (openoffice)
>
> Adam
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Luther Goh Lu Feng <elfgoh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: Mario Behling <mb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: lubuntu-desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 2:20:12 PM
>>> Subject: [Lubuntu-desktop] lubuntu - minimal install or full featured lightweight distro
>>>
>>>
>>> The question of lubuntu is:
>>> 1. Either we want to make it a minimal install or
>>> 2. we want to make it a lightweight alternative to full featured distros.
>>> I vouch for the second.
>>>
>>
>> I vote for #2. I always feel that it is a waste if the full 700MB of a cd is not even 50% used.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
>> Post to     : lubuntu-desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>
>
> --
>><)))*>  Embrace Eternity <*(((><
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
> Post to     : lubuntu-desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>