lubuntu-desktop team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: Try to make a conclusion for lxsession-logout and screen locking.
The features mentitioned in this mail is implemanted in "lock" branch now.
Please test if it works as expected.
If there are no obvious problems and objections, I'd like to merge it
to master branch to be included in the latest release of lxsession.
Thank you all.
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:53 PM, PCMan <pcman.tw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello list,
> After lengthy discussions, to solve the issue that lxsession lacks
> locking mechanism making "suspend" and "hibernate" insecure, I'll like
> to make a conclusion here.
> Here is the proposal and I'm going to do this in a separate branch for testing.
> 1. Add two config keys to desktop.conf in [Session] group:
> * LockScreen=true/false (default to true to be more secure, but
> provide a GUI option somewhere to turn it off)
> * LockCommand= (default to empty string)
> 2. If LockScreen=false, don't do any locking at all.
> If LockCommand is set, use that command for screen locking.
> Otherwise, fallback to default locking mechanism
> 3. Perform following default locking mechanism proposed in issue
> #3030907 if a specific LockCommand is not set.
> Look for usable locking command in this list:
> "gnome-screensaver-command --lock", "xscreensaver-command -lock",
> "xlock -mode blank". (This list can be expanded later)
> 4. If possible, do #3 in a shell script rather than hard coding it in
> C source code for easier custimization.
> I believe that this should cover most needs. Is this proposal acceptable?
> If there is no objection and no one is working on this issue now, I
> want to do it this week.
> I'll do it in a separate branch without touching any existing code in
> master branch so nothing will be broken.
> If after testing it works, we prepare a new release for lxsession.
> This may not be the best solution, but at least I should try to fix it.
> Comments and suggestions are welcomed.