lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[o jordan <ojordan12345@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'd prefer it if the mini/net installs were not on the QA tracker.  They've been a good fallback for PowerPC and I wouldn't want to loose them.  We've got enough to test and as has already been said, the installs take a long time and a lot of downloading.  If the alternate CD passes it's testcases then the mini will be okay.
 ojordan
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:13:04 +0000
From: PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx
To: maps.backward@xxxxxxxxx; ubuntu-qa-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC: lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lars.nooden@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Clean non-pae mini.iso install

Agreed,
I am including this one onto the 'main' QA team to get their input on adding the mini / net install isos to the qa tracker.
Regards,
Phill.


On 16 February 2012 21:07, Maps Backward <maps.backward@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


What kind of feedback on the powerpc mini.iso (or other ppc images) is

needed, how much, how often and where should it be reported?

generally i would say http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/ and indeed there is powerpc alternate/desktop testcases under Lubuntu but i don't see netinstalls anywhere, even for Ubuntu. so i'm not sure how those are "officially" tracked. Phil, do you have any thoughts on this?



that being said, i guess we should start by seeing if it works at all. do an install and then run the result. report any bugs with ubuntu-bug. tell us the results.

wxl



-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw



-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to     : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp