lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Lance <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx>]

And maybe, just maybe, we can get Colin Watson to bear the brunt of the work???????????

I tried to hammer this home here:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/930447/comments/50

So maybe my harping along with a request from the Xubuntu devs got things rolling. I think Colin does know that 90% of my suggestions/requests are at least somewhat sound. Sadly the other 10% are generally insane ;^(

Due to visual limitations I've never mastered IRC chat but maybe you could ask Colin, or the installer-team in general, and get an opinion.

Lance

--- On Sat, 3/17/12, Julien Lavergne <gilir@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Julien Lavergne <gilir@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Xubuntu reverting to non-pae kernel?
To: "Lance" <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "lubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, March 17, 2012, 9:13 AM

I saw it also, and still thinking about it. My point to keep pae by default was because nobody else done the same. I didn't want to maintain this exception only for us, and to give work to people only for this.
Since Xubuntu switch to non-pae by default, and the change to do it for us is very small, I am starting to think that we should do the same. Or, I can't see any point to not switch to non-pae by default.

Julien Lavergne
Le 17 mars 2012 à 13:33, Lance <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

I posted a couple of links here:

http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=11772755&postcount=1

If it's true I wonder if Lubuntu shouldn't do likewise. I personally think it makes sense since one of our target markets is low resource hardware.

Maybe someone could ask Colin Watson's opinion?
-- 
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users