← Back to team overview

lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

Re: Should we test Desktop more and Alternates less

 

I know nothing about powerpc but I've been on the edge of my seat ever since this was announced at UDS:

"Ubuntu’s Ubiquity installer will be ‘beefed up’ to provide all of the 
features offered by the ‘alternate installer’, resulting in the latter 
being dropped as a download option."

Seems scary to me, but the installer team tends to keep things "behind closed doors" and we mere mortals don't know what change has been made until the last shoe actually drops :^(

Lance

--- On Sun, 7/22/12, Julien Lavergne <gilir@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Julien Lavergne <gilir@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Should we test Desktop more and Alternates less
To: "Greg Faith" <gregfaith@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sunday, July 22, 2012, 5:55 AM

Le 07/22/2012 04:23 AM, Greg Faith a écrit :
> Since we keep hearing that alternates may go by the way-side I am
> wondering if we should concentrate our efforts on desktop testing and
> not alternate isos.  I know Lars and I are not having much luck with
> the alternate-powerpc iso.  I just had another failure on it and
> logged it.  Anyway, I have got to clean up the mess on my PowerBook G4
> as I have a bad install that will not boot right now, but the
> desktop-powerpc.isos are working well.
The question that you should ask is : If there is any hardware using
powerpc which not support installation with the desktop ISO ? On other
architectures, we keep an alternate ISO because we can't install Lubuntu
on some hardware (usually, when there is few RAM or disk space). If it's
not the case for powerpc, maybe we can drop the alternate ?

Regards,
Julien Lavergne

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to     : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Follow ups

References