lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

upon further investigation, the failure of the iso's being built was down
to a mis-understanding. Keeping you good testers "in the loop" has been
made more important.

Please do start testing [1]. Please do let me know if the re spins do not
carry bugs over.

Thanks,

Phill.
1. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/232/builds



On 3 September 2012 19:41, Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi guys & gals,
>
> maybe that should read 'lack of Beta 1 QA release'... Yes, something got
> very very broken. As it is an extended holiday in USA, it could not have
> fallen at a worse time.
>
> I'm a firm believer in Bad news first, followed by Good news :)
>
> Bad News:
>
> To give some idea as to how bad things happened, one of the re spins is on
> .7 (Yes, that is 7 re spins in the same day). I have refrained from nagging
> the -release team as the last thing they need is me distracting them. I'm
> sure a post-mortum will be held, but that is for another day.
>
> The -release team are working really hard to get the iso's back up. In
> fairness, a lot of this is not their fault so please don't blame them.
>
> I appreciate that not knowing what is going on can be frustrating; to that
> end can I remind you good people that we are allowed to log onto the pad
> area [1] on pain of death that we do NOT do edits. That area gives you the
> most up to date information as to what is happening.
>
> Good News:
>
> The bugs from previous spins are now carried over as 'be aware' section.
> That is actually no mean feat and addresses one of the major complaints
> that have been raised about re spins wiping out all previous bug reports.
> [2]
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phill.
>
> 1. http://pad.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-release
> 2. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/232/builds
> --
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
>


-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw