Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Can you good people now concentrate on getting the PPC-FAQ area updated? That will be the required area for the release notes. Don't forget, Lubuntu are now in charge.... make a good job, else I'll be filing complaints! :D Regards, Phill. On 8 October 2012 04:17, Greg Faith <gregfaith@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There are also a few NVIDIA graphic cards that are more of a problem than > our ATI radeon graphics. Their problem would not be address with some > radeon fix, and like I said if the radeonfb is removed I am afraid my G4 > will not work under KMS. So there are multiple problems it appears to me > and no Silver Bullet Magic, > Greg nm_geo > > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Arild <arild.lindseth@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Why is the graphics card/xorg/kernel bug that difficult to find a >> solution for? A stupid question perhaps, but I am merely an interested >> amateur and when I google it seem to have been similar issues with nearly >> all the Ubuntu ppc launches in the past (..several at least). Hopefully >> there is a good and easy enough solution for it to occur anytime soon. live >> video=radeonfb:1024x786-32@60 is the only workaround which have resulted >> in a bootable CD on my G4 >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> >> On 10/08/2012 03:43 AM, Greg Faith wrote: >> >> Crap typed too fast >> >> "live video=radeonfb:1024x786-32@60" command that works for me >> >> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Greg Faith <gregfaith@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> I must say I have to agree with Colin. In my case I am fairly sure if >>> he or someone removes the radeonfb my old PowerBook will not boot to a >>> workable live session. I base that on trying the kernel command line "live >>> video=ofonly", which gives me a great graphic plymouth, but stalls >>> everytime before the live session starts. >>> >>> I personally will continue to test using the command line "live >>> video=1024x786-32@60" which works for me, and I will add to my tests >>> what command line I used, but I will not *fail* the test if i can get a >>> live working session with decent graphics and complete the installation. >>> >>> I understand that having to make kernel command is not the desired >>> process , but as i remember before Beta2 and a few days after, we had to >>> make nomodeset or remove splash on the 12.10 amd64 iso to get a live >>> session if we had nVidia graphics. >>> >>> Basically what I am saying is if I can get a live session working and >>> make an install IT GETS A PASS. >>> I will annotate the qa-tracker and let the wiki dudes know what worked >>> for me. >>> >>> By the way Ron I read your email, and built a dd'ed USB and tested the >>> current daily live 20121007. >>> >>> 'live" or no command freezes in light blue screen with reboot required >>> "live video=ofonly" plymouth scrolling stops and freezes >>> "live video=1024x786-32@60" works here gets decent graphics and a live >>> session with (installablity) >>> >>> Greg nm_geo >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa >> Post to : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > Post to : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |