lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Jackson Doak <doak.jackson@xxxxxxxxx>]

and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/IncompleteBugs for bugs that need
pushing for various things within the community


On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Nicholas Skaggs <
nicholas.skaggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Yes, the milestones provided structure. We're missing good reporting for
> our dailies, but phillw and myself have opened a bug for that. Feel free to
> add to it:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website/+bug/1126449
>
> For now, here's a link sorted by descending date of all incomplete or
> unconfirmed bugs reported via the iso tracker;
>
> http://is.gd/qSVTH7
>
> In addition, you can use the tracker reports to see things (though it is
> sorted by milestone):
>
> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/defects/opened
>
> I think starting with the recent ones and weeding those down is a great
> focus. I'll try and target myself to weed out some during our cadence next
> week.
>
> Nicholas
>
> On 02/22/2013 03:34 PM, Lance wrote:
>
>   It would be great to even have a list here on the QA mailing list.
>
> When we were doing normal Alpha testing we'd sometimes have many rebuilds
> over a period of 3 to 4 days but we'd typically end up with an image that
> was usable by most of us, and a compilation of bugs that really needed
> attention.
>
> Now it's just a crap shoot.
>
> Lance
>
> --- On *Fri, 2/22/13, Jackson Doak <doak.jackson@xxxxxxxxx><doak.jackson@xxxxxxxxx>
> * wrote:
>
>
> From: Jackson Doak <doak.jackson@xxxxxxxxx> <doak.jackson@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Desktop, Alternate and flavours....
> To: "Nicholas Skaggs" <nicholas.skaggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><nicholas.skaggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Lance" <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx> <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx>,
> "lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Phill
> Whiteside" <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx> <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Lubuntu Comms"
> <lubuntu-comms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lubuntu-comms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "ubuntu-quality@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ubuntu-quality@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <ubuntu-quality@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ubuntu-quality@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "lubuntu-desktop" <lubuntu-dkestop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><lubuntu-dkestop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, February 22, 2013, 2:20 PM
>
>  i might make a wiki page for iso bugs that need confirming/looking at.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Nicholas Skaggs <
> nicholas.skaggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=nicholas.skaggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
>
>  Jackson, that's a good idea actually. We should pull the unconfirmed
> ubiquity bugs off the lp list and try and confirm or deny them. We've done
> similar drives in past cycles as the cycle gets further along. I think now
> is a good time. That's something we as a team can do to help the
> developers. I'll try and get a nice summary link to view and add it as a
> task for our cadence week.
>
> Thanks guys!
>
>
> Nicholas
>
> On 02/22/2013 03:03 PM, Jackson Doak wrote:
>
> there are things getting fixed, but not many. there doesn't seem to be
> enough testing though, even just to get some bugs confirmed. some bugs in
> the iso tracker have been "new" for a few months.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Lance <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
>
>    Do you have a bug report # for that ubiquity bug?
>
> I'm aware of this bug:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1080701
>
> It's been bugging many of us since mid-November but we obviously no longer
> care about the ability to install and/or test the images until Beta falls
> :^(
>
> I hate to be the turd in the punch-bowl, but why bother testing if nothing
> ever gets fixed?
>
> Lance
>
> PS: this is an indication that "cadence" should be renamed, maybe to
> "we'll look at it later"!
>
> --- On *Thu, 2/21/13, Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx><http://mc/compose?to=PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>
> * wrote:
>
>
> From: Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx><http://mc/compose?to=PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] Desktop, Alternate and flavours....
> To: lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "Nicholas Skaggs" <nicholas.skaggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=nicholas.skaggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> Cc: "Lubuntu Comms" <lubuntu-comms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=lubuntu-comms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>,
> ubuntu-quality@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=ubuntu-quality@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "lubuntu-desktop" <lubuntu-dkestop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=lubuntu-dkestop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> Date: Thursday, February 21, 2013, 5:49 PM
>
> Hi good people,
>
>  as we run through cadence testing, there does seem to be a lack of
> testing. Can I ask that people do test out the DeskTop versions for lubuntu
> and xubuntu as we seem to have a gremlin in ubiquity that may only affect
> our Virtual Machines. Also when you take the time out to try the
> 'alternate' ISOs for lubuntu, would you also please check out the basic
> ubuntu-server ISO, as it is required for us to maintain support for the
> lubuntu-alternate ISO series.
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Phill.
>
>  P.S. if anyone who is receiving this sort of email for the first time,
> please have a read of both the below links and feel free to get in touch.
> 1. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing
> 2. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam
>  <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing>--
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
> Post to     : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
> Post to     : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
>
>