lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi, as you will remember we didn't get both alternate and desktop out for
ppc each time, just because they do get the 'okay' does not stop them after
each milestone, Only if there is insufficient testing / too many critical
bugs with no work around on the day we have to say 'GO / NO GO' to the
final Release Candidate would that prevent a final release.

Regards,

Phill.

On 9 May 2013 18:48, Lars Nooden <lars.nooden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 9 May 2013, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> > On 2013-05-09 19:36, Julien Lavergne wrote:
> > > I'm fine with doing Alphas this cycle, as long as we have enough
> > > testers to test most of ISO for each Alpha. Any opinions from others
> > > testers ?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Julien Lavergne
> > >
> > I tend to come in late in the testing cycle (at the beta stage).
>
> I also tend to be a bit late in joining the cycle, but can probably take a
> crack at an alpha.  For me the hard part is juggling the limited hardware
> resources so that I can both test and have a working machine at the same
> time.  Many combinations are mutually exclusive.
>
> Regards,
> /Lars
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
> Post to     : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>



-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw