mahara-contributors team mailing list archive
-
mahara-contributors team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02551
Re: [Bug 702264] Re: Item order in Site Settings -> Security Settings -> Anti-spam
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I would suggest removing the numbering scheme and go for a config file
that has an array of the files to use in the order to use them.
On 28/01/11 23:14, Ruslan Kabalin wrote:
> Would be great if someone else from dev-team could advice on it, using
> numbers in the file name for weightening the spam methods seems OK to me
> (it could be replaced with keeping the weight as constants in the files,
> but it will be difficult to maintain). If it is all right I will
> implement the patch after refactoring and add required config table
> update.
>
- --
Regards,
Sean Brennan
sean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cell:0274729712
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=7wW7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mahara
Contributors, which is subscribed to Mahara.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702264
Title:
Item order in Site Settings -> Security Settings -> Anti-spam
Status in Mahara ePortfolio:
In Progress
Bug description:
Items are now ordered in alphabetical order, e.g. Advanced, None,
Simple. Maybe it would be better to display them in ascending-measures
order, e.g. None, Simple, Advanced
References