maria-developers team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: [Merge] lp:~maria-captains/maria/maria-xtradb into lp:maria
Kristian Nielsen <knielsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I think there are two issues here.
> One is that we are replacing InnoDB with XtraDB in MariaDB. Thus we need
> XtraDB to build and work on all the platforms that MariaDB should work on.
> The other is to get good performance/scalability of XtraDB. This is very
> important on the major platforms, but maybe not on all platforms.
> So it seems that right now XtraDB relies on GCC intrinsics for the performance
> improvements. I personally think this is fine. We can build with GCC on the
> main performance platforms I think. The main non-GCC platform currently is
> Windows, so we need XtraDB to build and work with non-GCC, but I think for now
> 8CPU+ scalability on Windows is not the most important priority.
> Later we can then add Windows method for scalability, or maybe switch to also
> build with GCC on Windows.
>> I am not sure what to do with this, I also need to look into
>> InnoDB-plugin 1.0.3, what solution they have and may be use new InnoDB
>> rw_locks instead of ours. Anyway - this is something to discuss.
> I will also look closer as time permits, checking the ./configure tests
> (already discussed this a bit with Sergei Golubchik) and the build failures
> when INNODB_RW_LOCKS_USE_ATOMICS is not defined.
Just to avoid duplicate work, let me just mention that I am now starting to
look into this issue. I will try to find a good way to make XtraDB
compile/work on all the platforms/compilers we want to support, and report
back what I discover.