maria-developers team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: Tungsten Replicator and MariaDB
On 19/06/2009, at 8:12 PM, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:45:08AM -0700, Robert Hodges wrote:
This brings up a question for the Maria dev team-what are your
any, for replication support in MariaDB? In particular, are there
plans that would affect binlog formats?
So far we don't have any planned or in-development features that
an effect on replication or binlog format. MariaDB's replication is
expected to be the same as MySQL replication.
This is the real world, and pragmatism is expected.
Things are broken in the land of MySQL replication, and thus we should
The fixes are actually available, so why even bother coming up with
Yep it changes/extends the binlog format. Tough! It's an upgrade; just
like any other, a newer server should be able to be a slave to an
But this is important stuff! For instance, adding checksums to the
binlog prevents a whole load of trouble. Not having it in there since
the start (yes SashaP, I know you're guilty - plus all those who
reviewed your code at the time) is a 10 year embarassment. Let's get
it right, now, shall we?
Arjen Lentz, Director @ Open Query (http://openquery.com)
Affordable Training and ProActive Support for MySQL & related
Follow our blog at http://openquery.com/blog/
OurDelta: free enhanced builds for MySQL @ http://ourdelta.org