maria-developers team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: Phone home
On Sep 09, Adam M. Dutko wrote:
> > So, "Phone Home" or "MySQL feedback daemon" or "better name wanted"
> > feature.
> Maybe call it "Butler" ??? Just a thought...
> > Not unlike the Uptimes Project or Debian Popularity Contest.
> Opt-in only with an easy disable option after opting in... correct?
Sorry, I didn't make it clear enough - the first email was only about
questions, unclear moments in this task. Whether it should be opt-in is
not one of them :)
> > The complete specs will be here:
> > http://askmonty.org/worklog/Server-Sprint/?tid=12
> I imagine the following ...
> (optionally by user) geographic location
> (optionally by user) user information / company name
> (optionally by user) Monty Program Ab customer support contract id
> won't be shown to everyone, correct? So maybe a filtered public
> versus unfiltered private view?
> > 1. Should that be a MariaDB plugin or a separate executable ?
> A separate executable would probably be the best for the reasons you
> highlight in your first paragraph. The drawbacks are probably covered by
> the fact that 1) if a user is having that awful of a time, they are probably
> able to step through the executing code or 2) the user probably has a
> support contract with a company that can step through the code and debug the
> problem. Granted more in depth statistics would be useful, but maybe it
> would make sense to have a separate project to create a loadable module that
> would be "more invasive." This tool seems to be oriented towards usage and
> "usage related" data, not necessarily troubleshooting/fixing.
> > 2. How to send the data.
> I imagine if the code is generated with this in mind it should be easy
> to switch out the "transport" (read transmission method) layer at a
> later time. Unless the person coding it really ties the data
> formatting and submission process to the protocol.
> 3. Auditing.
> I think the proxy idea, as well as the "wget mode" are great ideas.
> If the user isn't paranoid and doesn't want to "sniff traffic" one
> could also provide a log of all activities and a separate log for all
Yes. I was trying to find something convincing for paranoid users (like
me :). Normal users can just look in the log.
> > 4. What to report.
> > hardware: CPU, RAM
> maybe disk speeds? and type? (SATA vs SAS vs IDE)
Good idea. Indeed, it's important.
And to know if it's SSD or not.
> > OS (linux distribution, kernel)
> any libraries?
I don't know.
As you said it's not to troubleshoot, it's to steer development.
I don't know if we may want to optimize for a specific version of a
specific library. And if yes - for what library?
> > number of databases, max/avg number of tables in a database,
> the slightly insane might also run multiple instances on a single
> machine, so what about checking for other installations?
> Just a few thoughts, hopefully they're not distracting or useless.
Not at all!
Thanks for sharing them.