maria-developers team mailing list archive

[Pavel Ivanov <pivanof@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Agreed, follow_master_commits sounds pretty good.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Jonas Oreland <jonaso@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> i think follow_master_commits is better than follow_commits (and better than
> following_master)
>
> /Jonas
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Kristian Nielsen
> <knielsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Pavel Ivanov <pivanof@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > I'd say "following_master" will be very confusing, because degree of
>> > parallelization on slave won't match degree of parallelization on
>> > master in this case. Just because some commits are in different commit
>>
>> Right, that was my original concern as well. With two of us, there will
>> probably be other users who would find it confusing.
>>
>> > and that will take much more time combined. So it can be hardly called
>> > "following master". "follow_commits" could be more appropriate.
>>
>> Maybe "follow_master_commits", as Serg suggested? Not _too_ long, and
>> seems to
>> better describe what is going on.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>  - Kristian.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
>> Post to     : maria-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>