maria-developers team mailing list archive
-
maria-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #08577
Re: Please review: MDEV-7824 [Bug #68041] Zero date can be inserted in strict no-zero mode through a default value
Hi Sergei,
Thanks for review! See my comments inline:
On 05/07/2015 06:57 PM, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
Hi, Alexander!
On Mar 25, Alexander Barkov wrote:
Hi Sergei,
Please review a patch for mdev-7824.
It's based on a MySQL patch for
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=68041
and is a blocker for:
MDEV-3929 Add full support for auto-initialized/updated timestamp and
datetime
That looks good.
But I don't like it that you verify defaults for every row.
It's not very cheap. And neither defaults nor sql_mode can change in the
duration of one statement. It should be enough to test only once.
This is a good idea. I copied the patch from MySQL. So it will be nice
to have this implemented in MariaDB in a faster way.
I'm not sure, though, how to do that with a minimal overhead. A couple
of bool's in TABLE, like
bool all_default_are_checked;
bool write_set_defaults_are_checked;
that are set to false at the beginning on INSERT,INSERT...SELECT,LOAD.
And used like that
bool TABLE::restore_record_and_validate_unset_fields(THD *thd, bool all)
{
restore_record(this, s->default_values);
if (all ? all_default_are_checked : write_set_defaults_are_checked)
return false;
if (all) all_default_are_checked= true;
else write_set_defaults_are_checked= true;
return validate_default_values_of_unset_fields(thd);
}
and in mysql_insert():
if (fields.elements || !value_count)
{
if (table->restore_record_and_validate_unset_fields(thd, !value_count))
Sorry, I did't understand your idea about having two separate
flags for "all" and "write_set".
Is it for the cases when one mixes empty and non-empty parenthesized
value lists, like these:
insert into (a,b) t1 values (),(10,20);
insert into (a,b) t1 values (10,20),();
???
Note, this currently does not work and return this error:
ERROR 1136 (21S01): Column count doesn't match value count at row 2
Looks like a bug. I guess this could work.
If so, would you like me to report and fix it before mdev-7824?
Thanks.
Regards,
Sergei
Follow ups
References