maria-developers team mailing list archive
-
maria-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #13266
Re: Review input for MDEV-21092, 21095, 29997 - part #2
Hi Rex,
I am looking at the latest commit:
commit 9eba044b9710bbdd8195e887cfdd4d62233942ca (HEAD -> bb-MDEV-21092-21095-29997-optimizer-trace-updates,
Author: Rex <rex.johnston@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Dec 2 16:46:54 2022 +1200
MDEV-21092,MDEV-21095,MDEV-29997: Optimizer Trace for index condition pushdown, partition pruning, exists-to-in
Add Optimizer Tracing for:
- Index Condition Pushdown
- Partition Pruning
- Exists-to-IN optimization
and trying this testcase:
== testcase ==
--source include/have_sequence.inc
create table t1 (
a int,
b int,
key(a)
);
insert into t1 select seq, seq from seq_1_to_10000;
--optimizer_trace
explain format=json select * from t1 where a < 20 and (a+1<a+2) and b=3333;
drop table t1;
== Testcase ends ==
In the output I see:
== Output ==
{
"make_join_readinfo": [
{
"table": "t1",
"index_condition": "t1.b = 3333" // WRONG-1
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"attaching_conditions_to_tables": {
"attached_conditions_computation": [],
"attached_conditions_summary": [
{
"table": "t1",
"attached_condition": "t1.b = 3333",
"index_condition": "t1.a < 20 and t1.a + 1 < t1.a + 2"
}
]
}
},
== Output ends ==
note the line marked "WRONG-1".
I also think some of the recent changes in the patch go in the wrong
direction. Let me take over, I think I'll make a patch to fix both.
BR
Sergei
--
Sergei Petrunia, Software Developer
MariaDB Corporation | Skype: sergefp | Blog: http://petrunia.net
References