maria-discuss team mailing list archive
-
maria-discuss team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04651
Re: Duplication of documentation for binlog annotation and a question on replicate_annotate_row_events not being dynamic
-
To:
maria-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Ian Gilfillan <ian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:48:59 +0200
-
In-reply-to:
<CAAL5NzE3WkSHCwKv+h-S1F9VF7tswf=z204LxSM12z12VpkZ0A@mail.gmail.com>
-
Organization:
MariaDB Foundation
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
Regarding the documentation, thanks for reporting. Yes, pure duplication
is always at risk of diverging, so I will remove the detailed variable
description from [1] and rather link to [3],[4]
On 29/06/2017 16:23, Jean-Francois B. Gagne wrote:
In [1], we can find the documentation for the
options binlog-annotate-row-events and replicate-annotate-row-events,
and [2] points to [1]. However, there is a duplication of that
documentation in [3] and [4], is there a reason for that (there is a
risk of those 2 documentation diverging) ?
[1]: https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/annotate_rows_log_event/
[2]: https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/mysqld-options/
[3]:
https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/replication-and-binary-log-server-system-variables/#binlog_annotate_row_events
[4]:
https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/replication-and-binary-log-server-system-variables/#replicate_annotate_row_events
References