maria-docs team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: [Maria-developers] MariaDB 5.2.6 release preparations
On 13/05/2011, at 12:05 AM, Daniel Bartholomew wrote:
Ok, sorry about that. I saw the commit message "Merge with MySQL
and just assumed that it meant all of 5.1.57 and .58 were merged.
Any suggestions for how to phrase it? I've removed "all of the" from
phrase "including all of the upstream changes from MySQL 5.1.57/58",
I've removed the links to the MySQL changelogs, but it's possible
might still assume that everything from 5.1.57/58 was merged.
Creating a list of each change that we actually pulled in seems like
overkill for a Release Notes page (it's supposed to just be the
abbreviated highlights of the release).
People must be able to assess what the version contains.
I've previously noted that an external reference is less than optimal,
but is there a precise changelog of the MariaDB release that lists
exactly which modifications were made (and as a matter of interest,
which upstream version they came from, where relevant).
While I agree with you that the release notes don't necessarily have
to contain everything, as that's what a changelog is for.
However, the changelog should be there. So in a nutshell, I think the
list of each change pulled *should* be made, the remaining issue being
where to publish it - I'm fine with MariaDB release notes referring to
MariaDB changelog for more detail.
Ref to a bzr branch merge is not sufficient, IMHO... it would put a
lot of hassle on the shoulders of users and other parties (many of
whom don't even have the expertise to assess the bzr log info to that
extent) and that kind of stuff seriously hinders adoption - and it can
even trigger people moving away.
Arjen Lentz, Exec.Director @ Open Query (http://openquery.com)
Remote expertise & maintenance for MySQL/MariaDB server environments.
Follow us at http://openquery.com/blog/ & http://twitter.com/openquery