mlhim-owners team mailing list archive

[Timothy Cook <timothywayne.cook@xxxxxxxxx>]

My only concern is that it was uploaded as 1.0  This is not consistent
with the way the versions were being handled.  If you are going to
take MLHIM back to a 1.0 release then there should be some kind of
documentation as well as marking the model itself.  I see that the
ECore model still carries a mlhim2 label.

I don't have a problem with going back to 1.0 if you want.  But the
work needs to be done to make the entire model consistent.

--Tim


On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 19:24, Luciana Tricai Cavalini
<lutricav@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello mlhim-owners,
>
> In order to provide visibility of MLHIM among metamodel researchers, I
> decided to upload the ecore version of MLHIM to the Zoo of Metamodels:
>
> Then the Zoo managers had the initiative of apply some converters and
> now the model is available on several formats (UML, KM3, Clojure, SQL etc).
>
> The links are:
>
> http://modeling-languages.com/multilevel-healthcare-information-modelling-metamodel/
>
> and
>
> http://www.emn.fr/z-info/atlanmod/index.php/ZooFederation#Multilevel_Healthcare_Information_Modelling_1.0
>
> Not sure about how useful that is, but I thought it could be a good
> making-friends-and-influencing-people move.
>
> I hope you all understand my good intents.
>
> Regards,
>
> Luciana.
>
> --
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antivírus e
>  acredita-se estar livre de perigo.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mlhim-owners
> Post to     : mlhim-owners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mlhim-owners
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>



-- 
================
Timothy Cook, MSc
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
Skype ID == timothy.cook
Academic.Edu Profile: http://uff.academia.edu/TimothyCook