mlhim-owners team mailing list archive

[Luciana Tricai Cavalini <lutricav@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Tim,

OK. I'll talk to them and ask them to fix the version number.

-- Lu



Em 24/08/2011 21:50, Timothy Cook escreveu:
> My only concern is that it was uploaded as 1.0  This is not consistent
> with the way the versions were being handled.  If you are going to
> take MLHIM back to a 1.0 release then there should be some kind of
> documentation as well as marking the model itself.  I see that the
> ECore model still carries a mlhim2 label.
> 
> I don't have a problem with going back to 1.0 if you want.  But the
> work needs to be done to make the entire model consistent.
> 
> --Tim
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 19:24, Luciana Tricai Cavalini
> <lutricav@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello mlhim-owners,
>>
>> In order to provide visibility of MLHIM among metamodel researchers, I
>> decided to upload the ecore version of MLHIM to the Zoo of Metamodels:
>>
>> Then the Zoo managers had the initiative of apply some converters and
>> now the model is available on several formats (UML, KM3, Clojure, SQL etc).
>>
>> The links are:
>>
>> http://modeling-languages.com/multilevel-healthcare-information-modelling-metamodel/
>>
>> and
>>
>> http://www.emn.fr/z-info/atlanmod/index.php/ZooFederation#Multilevel_Healthcare_Information_Modelling_1.0
>>
>> Not sure about how useful that is, but I thought it could be a good
>> making-friends-and-influencing-people move.
>>
>> I hope you all understand my good intents.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Luciana.
>>
>> --
>> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antivírus e
>>  acredita-se estar livre de perigo.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mlhim-owners
>> Post to     : mlhim-owners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mlhim-owners
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antiv�s e
 acredita-se estar livre de perigo.