mlhim-owners team mailing list archive

[Timothy Cook <timothywayne.cook@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Luciana & All,

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:45, Luciana Tricai Cavalini
<lutricav@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Since our community is basicly composed by expectators, I want to tell
> you that I support the majority of the changes that you are making; on
> the other hand, we need to figure out a way to develop a least two tiny
> had-coded demos and send data extracts from one to another and publish
> it quickly on an Open Acess journal. Without that, everything we are
> discussing here is a conjecture, and MLHIM deserves to be much more than
> a conjecture.

I agree with the need to prototype and publish.

However,  the changes that I am suggesting have either come about
through your teaching modelling or through XML-ization of the model.
I believe we should move forward with these changes and base the
prototypes on the resulting model (2.3.0).

There is also one blueprint that I entered in June:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mlhim-specs/+spec/remove-ontology

This is regarding eliminating the ontology of a CCD.  The explaination
is in the blueprint.  But I'll just add that the XML way of creating
specific options for an attribute is through use of the enumeration
facet.  As suggested by someone, we can handle translations through a
translation service.  Maybe HKCR.net?

Thoughts?


--Tim