On Monday 03,May,2010 05:44 PM, Alex Lourie wrote: > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) > <sephiroth7vii@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:sephiroth7vii@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > I think it'd be better to keep the ordering static and alphabetical, > in order to make it easier for users to establish muscle memory of > how to use the menu. > > > I don't agree. What if I have 10 applications that support sound > settings? Will they all always appear in the list? That would be > horrible user experience. > > Will only *running* applications be there? Then no muscle memory can be > developed, as the list will be populated and re-sorted when new > application runs; this will cause some applications change their > location in the list. I think some persistence can be built up by having applications always reappear in the same location, similar to how application indicators are ordered. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature