[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ayatana] Brainstorming the Me Menu again
- To: ayatana <ayatana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Ayatana] Brainstorming the Me Menu again
- From: topdownjimmy <topdownjimmy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:04:34 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=P3nOQH9C+yJKxX/VkfNTlGf0VUe7EopE9Jv0Y9fNOZI=; b=SA7nJxf7RmnrOX1uvKtCK441ZA0saK40nOhjFXAC2sGKyIKx5aFlWjSnjK5e9+PlBb a52yTfmfMiSRz0/ZqTitb0mEnQF3nbzByypY3q4ZqdjKWXyhVordvLPeH4yXGS9cRLtH +y7nkztqtn7eS4L6K9gnYI8dY/3YdxwjNUm/M=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=KOMFPgmvyOU2H2LXMCUHfr5v0Q0RksDpUT4g35k0J1EL2juuJ/BA85HHRrlB9qUOg9 FptX53y7jxY66X6RHhkuTEAgUP143zRRMWMc8zM0ggs0JJ3r9c+61KC7NGqcWqmSaFGh LcdEGuwSwTHt52l/unEf+P5WUPlku/wG+LYJU=
- In-reply-to: <1277810274.17595.35.camel@laptop>
- List-archive: <http://lists.launchpad.net/ayatana>
- List-help: <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
- List-id: <ayatana.lists.launchpad.net>
- List-owner: <https://launchpad.net/~ayatana>
- List-post: <mailto:ayatana@lists.launchpad.net>
- List-subscribe: <https://launchpad.net/~ayatana>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://launchpad.net/~ayatana>
- References: <1277799547.17595.27.camel@laptop> <1277800611.1645.9.camel@charly> <1277810274.17595.35.camel@laptop>
- Sender: jsitter@xxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Conscious User <conscioususer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I think this does quite a lot for clearing up the purpose of that field.
> > But if you just look at that without prior/external knowledge, you still
> > would have to ask: Say where? To whom?
>
> I agree. In fact, seconds after sending the mockup I wondered if it
> wouldn't confuse users into thinking it was a IM reply field, like
> the gnome-shell message tray:
>
> http://people.gnome.org/~mccann/shell/mockups/20090630/04-chat-details.png
>
> As much as I hate to admit it (and God knows how much I do), I don't
> think that there is a brand-neutral word as effective as that dreadful
> word, "tweet".
Maybe rather than lamenting the fact that there isn't an established
service-agnostic term for tweeting/denting/status-ing, we can see this
as an opportunity to coin one and put some momentum behind it. It's
something people have desired for a long time anyway.
The only reasonable candidate I can think of at the moment is "shout,"
which benefits from (a) being both a noun and a verb, and (b) being
familiar as a result of "shoutboxes" -- which don't serve precisely
the same function, of course, but are similar in that they're public
messages.