Re: [Ayatana] OpenOffice bugs as paper cuts

[Mark Curtis <merkinman@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm going to guess it's because Lotus Symphony's license is proprietary, not FOSS

---

From: ubuntu.thamawij@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:11:31 +0700
To: vish@xxxxxxxxxx
CC: ayatana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Ayatana] OpenOffice bugs as paper cuts

Hi All,

I've cough by the title. I just wanna ask why IBM Lotus Symphony doesn't be considered to integrate by default to Ubuntu ? I'm currently using and it looks nice for the interface. It may lack some features in spreadsheet, such as URL data import, but I've found it way better than OOffice. Especially, the right handed tools, interface and icons.

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Vishnoo <vish@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 14:34 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Is it still worth accepting OOo bugs as paper cuts given the lame duck
> status of the suite at this stage?

Most(maybe even all?) of the present remaining OOo papercuts were
carried over from last cycle.

Desktop team mentioned that whether we stick with OOo or switch to LibO
for Natty is still not finalized. It depends on how fast LibO
development progresses and how far it is ready before our feature
freeze.
So for now, since OOo is still in the default Natty install , it's not
harmful to get a few of its bugs fixed. ;)

--
Cheers,
Vish


_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to     : ayatana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp